Pages

Showing posts with label medical therapy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label medical therapy. Show all posts

Friday, 3 February 2017

Endometriosis - Going Back to Basics

This is a blogpost I’ve been meaning to do for a while now. In this blog I mostly write about specific research with a pretty narrow focus, but what about the general information about endometriosis that people might want to know? There are of course many good resources out there in the vast expanse that is the internet, but at the same time there is misinformation and bad advice out there as well. With that in mind I’m going to try and put together a list of, what I think, is useful information for anyone starting their journey into endo, or those who simply want to know more about it. As the title says it is very much the basics so I’ve provided some links throughout this post to longer articles that cover certain topics in more detail. If I’ve missed out anything glaringly obvious, or there is something you’d like to know and want me to add to this list, add a comment to the bottom of this post, or tweet me @endoupdateblog

To begin with then, let’s start with the most obvious and basic question

What is Endometriosis?

Endometriosis, those six unwieldy syllables, means different things to different people. To the suffer it is a malign, invisible tormentor. To the doctors/surgeons it is a minefield of trial and error.  To the researcher it is an enigmatic mystery to be solved. But I doubt you came here to read about the philosophical descriptions of endometriosis (and if you did, sorry, maybe I’ll cover that in a different blog post). I’m guessing you want to know what endometriosis physically is. Before I do that however, some prerequisite knowledge is needed about the female reproductive system.

If you’re reading this you either possess, or at the very least know about, the uterus (womb).
Image Courtesy of By OpenStax College [CC BY 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Inside the uterus is a thick muscular layer called the myometrium, this is responsible for contractions during labour and those wonderful menstrual cramps I know women are so fond of [sarcasm]. The inner lining layer of the uterus is called endometrium, which is the ‘functional’ part. The endometrium is the part of the uterus that grows and sheds with each menstrual cycle and is responsible for the bleeding that I know women are so fond of [more sarcasm]. I’ve written before about how the endometrium and the menstrual cycle work so I won’t cover that here. The point to take away is that the endometrium is inside the uterus and during the menstrual cycle it grows and then breaks down and sheds off during menstruation.

Endometriosis is defined as patches of endometrium-like tissue (called endometriotic lesions) outside the uterus. Now I use the term ‘endometrium-like’ purposefully here. You see the patches of tissue that comprise endometriosis resemble the endometrium when looked at under a microscope. However several studies, which have analysed endometriosis and the endometrium at the molecular level, have shown there are numerous differences between the two tissue types. In any case endometriosis is often referred to as ectopic endometrium (literally meaning ‘out of place endometrium), or endometriotic tissue, whereas the normal endometrium is often referred to as the eutopic endometrium. Endometriosis is still responsive to hormones in a similar manner to the normal endometrium, so the theory goes that, throughout the menstrual cycle, endometriosis grows and bleeds, but unlike the normal endometrium, the blood has nowhere to go because its inside the pelvic cavity. Whether or not endometriosis does actually ‘bleed’ is somewhat contentious, but the presence of endometriotic lesions does certainly lead to inflammation, pain, subfertility and a myriad of other horrible symptoms depending on the extent and location of endometriosis.

Almost as important as what endometriosis is, is what endometriosis is not. Endometriosis is not an infection of any kind, it’s not communicable, it’s not a cancer and is not fatal, however just because something is not fatal, doesn’t mean it can’t take your life away.

Also you cannot define endometriosis purely by its symptoms, endometriosis is not just painful periods. Sure, some women with endometriosis have painful periods, some don’t, some women have pain so severe it is literally disabling, but endometriosis is a complex condition that requires holistic and often personalised approach. For example, one woman with endo may have severe pelvic pain, depression, anxiety and bowel pain, whereas another woman may have no pain or psychological symptoms, but is infertile, these two cases would require very specific and different approaches.  

Which brings me to my next point: the types of endometriosis.

Endometriosis is subject to a grading system depending on the extent and type of the disease, which you can read about in more detail here. Endometriosis is usually categorised into four stages (minimal, mild, moderate and severe), which depend on the type, extent and location of the disease.  Although the stages sound fairly descriptive of the disease, that is not necessarily the case. The stage of disease doesn’t always correlate with the symptoms experienced, so a woman with severe disease can have no symptoms and a women with minimal disease can have debilitating symptoms and vice versa.

In the broadest terms there are three types of endometriosis. Superficial endometriosis are lesions that can be found anywhere around the pelvic area. However, they are most frequently found on the surface of organs/ligaments/structures of the pelvis and can be as small as to be almost invisible to the naked eye, or about as large as a pea and any size in between. This type of endo comes in a variety of different colours: red lesions are considered to be ‘active’ in that they produce inflammatory factors and can have a dense network of blood vessels supplying them, blue/black lesions are similar to red but are seen as an older form of the disease, white lesions are thought to represent even older and inactive endometriosis, but often have a lot of scar tissue associated with them which can pull or restrict the surrounding tissue leading to pain. There is some evidence to suggest that superficial endometriosis undergoes a transition from red > blue > white, but how and at what speed this transition occurs isn’t known.

The next type is endometriotic cysts. These are most commonly found on the ovaries and are cysts filled with old blood that takes on a brown colour, giving them the undeservedly pleasant name ‘chocolate cysts’. These cysts can grow to be quite large, ranging from a few centimetres on average, to massive cysts in very rare cases. Because they affect the ovaries, endometriotic cysts tend to be associated with decreases in fertility, fortunately there are treatment options available to restore fertility to women with endometriosis associated subfertility, but I’ll be discussing that later on.

The third type is deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). As the name suggests these are lesions that are actually dug into the tissue of the pelvis. Because DIE can penetrate into tissues it can be quite challenging for surgeons to remove completely and has been known to cause some of the more severe symptoms associated with endometriosis.

Although endometriosis is mostly found in the pelvis, there are other, rarer forms of the disease that can be found elsewhere, this is termed ‘extra-pelvic’ or ‘extra-genital’ endometriosis. I’ve tried to list all the places endometriosis can be found in the human body (that we know of) and it would seem it can be found almost anywhere. However, it is definitely worth remembering that endometriosis outside the pelvis is extremely rare, some cases of endometriosis in places you wouldn’t expect to find it have only been reported once.

What are the symptoms of endometriosis?

To put it one way; everything, nothing and all things in between. In less simplistic terms endometriosis can present with no symptoms at all. Some women are only diagnosed when they are having an operation for another condition, or when there is an investigation for something linked to endo, like fertility issues. However, for those who do get symptoms, the most common one is pain, pain pain pain and more pain, plus other things as well because apparently all that pain isn’t enough. The most common pain symptom of endometriosis is dysmenorrhoea (pronounced DIS-MEN-OH-RE-AH), which is defined as excessively painful periods that cause interference to the daily life of the sufferer and is experienced by half to two-thirds of women with endometriosis at some point in their life.

Now even I know that ‘normal’ periods (if there is such a thing) aren’t like the tampon commercials make them out to be; it’s not all blue liquid and laughing while playing beach volleyball. However, if your periods are causing you to regularly miss school/work or social occasions because they are so painful, this is not ok and could very well be a sign of an underlying medical condition, like endometriosis. I can’t emphasise this point enough because there is a massive delay in diagnosis experienced by women with endometriosis. On average this delay is 7-9 years, depending on where you live and what healthcare you have access to, so there can be shorter or longer diagnosis times. Either way such a long diagnostic delay is utterly unacceptable. Can you imagine going to a doctor, in excruciating pain, and being told “sure, I’ll tell you what’s wrong with you, in seven years”? Chances are you wouldn’t be happy about that. Unfortunately that is the reality many women with endo have to face.

A factor that doesn’t help the diagnostic delay is that the most accurate way to diagnose endometriosis is with a surgical operation called laparoscopy, where cameras are inserted into the pelvic cavity and the surgeon has a good examination of the pelvic organs. If the surgeon finds something suspicious they can take a biopsy and send it away to be analysed to confirm the presence of endometriosis. Finding endometriosis, of course, is dependent on the skill and experience of the surgeon.

There are non-invasive imaging techniques that can aid in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Ultrasound, for example, can be useful in finding ovarian endometriotic cysts, whilst MRI can identify cysts, distortion of the pelvic organs caused by endometriosis and can look inside organs without the need for surgery. However, these techniques have nowhere near the accuracy of actually looking into the pelvis with a camera. Unfortunately there is no accurate blood test for endometriosis, however many research groups are working hard on this, not as a replacement for laparoscopy, but as a means of identifying women at high risk of endometriosis and reducing diagnostic delay.

From the studies I’ve read and the women I’ve spoken to, the most significant contributor to this diagnostic delay is invalidation of the sufferer’s symptoms. Some women with endometriosis, particularly young girls with symptoms of the disease, are told by medical professionals that painful periods are ‘normal’. Women are often prescribed painkillers or contraceptive pills to manage their symptoms. Whilst these treatments can offer some relief, they can be ineffective in some women. These women can often face further struggle to get their symptoms taken seriously and can end up being labelled as hysterical (hysteria literally translates as ‘suffering of the womb’) and can have their symptoms ascribed to psychological rather than physical conditions.

It is true that women with endometriosis are at an increased risk of being diagnosed with mood disorders, depression and anxiety. However, studies have also shown that after successful surgery to remove endometriosis, depressive symptoms regress and overall emotional wellbeing increases. This is extremely important to note as it shows that the physical symptoms of endometriosis can be causative of the psychological symptoms, not the other way around. Of course it is possible that psychological disturbances could lead to alteration in pain perception, meaning that a vicious cycle can be established where pain leads to depression, which leads to increased pain sensitivity, which leads to more depression and so on and so on, but at the head of it all is the disease itself. 

Another of the common pain symptoms associated with endometriosis is chronic pelvic pain, which affects around a third of women with endo. This differs from dysmenorrhoea in that it doesn’t necessarily refer to pelvic pain during menstruation and can be caused by numerous other diseases or conditions. Chronic pelvic pain can be continuous or intermittent and can be associated with a variety of factors, for example exercise, specific foods or certain activities, or it may just come on randomly.

Painful sex (also known as dyspareunia – pronounced DIS-PAR-YOO-NEE-AH) is one of the symptoms of endometriosis that doesn’t get much attention despite the fact it affects a third to two-thirds of women with endometriosis.  Part of the reason dyspareunia gets little acknowledgement is that it is a very personal and private matter, which can understandably be difficult to talk about openly. Studies have indicated that women who have endometriosis (particularly DIE) behind the vagina, in an area known as the rectovaginal septum, are more likely to suffer from dyspareunia. One of the most challenging aspects of this symptom is the effect it can have on relationships. I myself know how important it is to have an open dialogue with partners to ensure they understand the physical limitations endometriosis can place on the sufferer, but I’ll be discussing more on that later.

There are whole host of others symptoms that can be associated with endometriosis that vary from person to person in terms of frequency and severity. Some of these include: leg pain, bloating, painful urination, painful bowel movements, heavy menstrual bleeding, spotting in between periods and fatigue.   

Endometriosis is also the proverbial misery that loves company. Rarely does a woman have endometriosis and nothing else.  I wrote a whole blog post on the subject, which you can read here, that gives details on some of the most informative studies looking at which other conditions are, and are not, found more frequently in women with endo.

As you can probably tell from reading this far, there are an awful lot of potential presentations and symptoms of endometriosis, some women may present with nearly all of them, some women may present with none. Each person’s journey with endometriosis will have elements that are shared with many other sufferers, but at the same time will have elements that are very specific to their own personal experience of the disease. This unfortunately, also makes endometriosis all the more difficult to diagnose and treat effectively.

Who gets endometriosis?

That’s a good question. Unfortunately there is very little good quality information available that could give us an answer. We do know that endometriosis affects around 1 in 10 women of reproductive age, but it would seem that endometriosis can affect anyone, of any age (I’ve read case reports of endometriosis in infants and women in their seventies, although I should point out these cases are very, very rare) and of any race/socioeconomic background.

Studies have shown that women with a family history of endometriosis are more likely to have the disease. This implies there is a strong genetic component to endometriosis and that the risk can be passed from parent to child. This doesn’t mean that a woman with endometriosis is guaranteed to pass the disease to her daughter; rather the chance of her daughter having endometriosis is increased. Endometriosis can also appear in women with no family history, the causes for this ‘spontaneous’ form of the disease are still hotly debated, in fact no-one truly knows why endometriosis occurs at all, but there are plenty of ideas, some of which I’ll be discussing later.

We do see that women aged 21-35 are more likely to be diagnosed than women of other age brackets. This has led to the misconception that endometriosis is a ‘career woman’s disease’, which afflicts those women who delay childbearing to further their career. This notion is not only insulting to women, it is also factually incorrect.

In my view there are two main reasons that endometriosis appears to be more common in in women in their mid-twenties to early thirties. Firstly, the symptoms of endometriosis tend to appear in adolescence, if you factor in the aforementioned diagnostic delay of 7-9 years then it becomes apparent diagnosed occurs in your mid-twenties.  Secondly, the notion that delaying childbirth is somehow responsible for causing endometriosis is simply wrong. There is some evidence to suggest that, during pregnancy, the symptoms of endometriosis can subside. However, symptoms can rapidly return after giving birth. Having children is in no way a cure for endometriosis. It is also incredibly insensitive to suggest to a woman, who has a condition characterised by high rates of fertility problems, that delaying childbearing is the cause for said condition, or that having children is the solution to it. That is like telling a person in a wheelchair that not walking is the cause for their paralysis and it can be cured by going for a jog.

From what I have learnt over the years it would seem that the reason endometriosis is so commonly diagnosed in women of a particular age range, is not because of the choices or lifestyle of the women in question, but because of lack of awareness and education about endometriosis. This is endemic, not only amongst the public, but also in the medical community. There are a great deal of myths and misinformation about endometriosis (several of which I have wrote about previously) and women with endo often have to become experts on the subject themselves in order to justify their illness to others.

I have encountered this ignorance personally, mostly in the form of bizarre theories about what causes endometriosis and how it should be treated (my favourite one to date was the doctor, yes a doctor, that said endometriosis can be caused by wearing your trousers too tight!). The most important weapon any woman with endometriosis can have is knowledge. Resources and information are plentiful, but the best piece of advice I could give is always ask for evidence. If someone suggests a treatment, ask what studies support their assertion. Where does the evidence come from? Are there studies that show how effective it is? Asking just a few simple questions like this can quickly reveal which claims have no basis in evidence.

Fortunately there are many great organisations out there that are fighting for better awareness and education for endometriosis and they are doing a great job of it. I myself have noticed a distinct improvement in endometriosis awareness in the last 10 years, so the future looks bright.

What are the treatments?

There are many treatments for endometriosis, but no cure. That itself is a contentious statement and lies in the tricky semantics of the word ‘cure’. Some would argue that surgery which removes all endometriosis and gets rid of its symptoms is a cure, but with endometriosis there is always a chance the disease could recur, maybe not for years or decades, but there is still a chance and if a person’s disease relapses, then they were never truly cured. We could get bogged down in this argument about meaning all day, so let’s not do that. Instead let’s discuss what the treatments for endometriosis are and their effectiveness.

Endometriosis is not a ‘one disease, one treatment’ affair, there are many treatment options open for women with endometriosis and it is often quite a minefield of trial and error to find the right one. Something that definitely needs to be considered is that endometriosis is rarely a disease of just one symptom. Endometriosis requires a holistic approach to therapy that considers all aspects and impact the disease has on a person’s life.

Most women when they are first diagnosed, or when they are suspected to have endometriosis, are prescribed painkillers. These vary in effectiveness with some women finding minor relief and some women finding no relief at all. In others the pain can be so severe as to require very strong painkillers like codeine or morphine. Painkillers though do nothing to treat the disease itself, merely to reduce the symptoms, if pain symptoms are severe then further treatment needs to be sought.

There are several types of hormonal medication that women with endometriosis may be offered, the most common ones are:

·         Birth control pills (BCPs) contain a form of estrogen and a progestin (which acts like progesterone). These are also known as ‘combined’ pills as they combine two hormone types in one pill. The rationale for using this treatment is that endometriosis needs estrogen to remain active, the pill reduces the amount of estrogen in the body to a constant low level. You may wonder why, if endometriosis needs estrogen, does the pill have estrogen in it? Estrogen is added to prevent some side effects like breakthrough bleeding and actually works to make the pill a more effective as a contraceptive. It is thought that endometriosis requires a certain threshold of estrogen to remain active. The combination pill contains such a low dose of estrogen that it is below this threshold and therefore safe for treating endometriosis.

There are many different brands and formulations of birth control pills so it’s always worth asking your doctor what the exact composition of your medication is (although this should also be provided on the instruction insert that comes with your medications). The way in which the formulation of the pill varies determines whether it is monophasic or multiphasic. Monophasic pills contain the same levels of each hormone in each pill, multiphasic drugs on the other hand, deliver different levels of hormones over the course of a month. The multiphasic drugs were developed in order to reduce some of the unwanted side effects of monophasic drugs.

·         Progestin only pills (POPs), or mini-pills, only contain a progestin; these tend to be used if a patient finds the side effects of the combination pill intolerable. At present there is no evidence to suggest whether POPs or BCPs are better for the treatment of endometriosis, but because of how differently each woman may react to each drugs, it is difficult to say which is best. Medical guidelines suggest BCPs and POPs are used as a first line treatment for endometriosis and can be safely taken for long periods of time, provided the side effects are tolerable. Progestins can also be given as an injection (the most well-known being depo-provera), and via an intrauterine device (commonly known as the coil), which provides more local delivery of the drug, in theory reducing the side effects. Injections and the coil have the advantage of providing long term therapy without having to take pills every day, but the disadvantage that, if side effects become problematic, the drug cannot be stopped as easily as pills can. It is always a good idea to discuss with your doctor which form of treatment is right for you, particularly as medications designed to prevent conception aren’t ideal of you want to conceive anytime soon.

·         Gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) are, as the name suggests, drugs that mimic the effect of GnRH in the body. These drugs work by dramatically reducing the production of estrogen by the ovaries, essentially putting the body into a false menopause and are generally used as a second line treatment for endometriosis. Although GnRHa’s have been shown to have some beneficial effects in reducing the symptoms of endometriosis (however evidence shows their benefit is comparable to that of other treatments like the coil and BCPs) and improving conception if given for 3 months prior to trying to conceive, they often come with a hefty amount of side effects and cannot be taken for longer than 6 months without increasing the risk of causing permanent health problems. The menopause-like state they induce can result in side effects like mood swings, weight changes, hot flashes, vaginal dryness and loss of bone density to name but a few, which means this is where careful consideration needs to be made in terms of downsides weighed up against benefits.  A popular option offered to women to reduce the side effects of this treatment is ‘add back’ therapy. This is essentially hormone replacement therapy (HRT), where a small dose of estrogen is given to alleviate the side effects of estrogen withdrawal. You may wonder why or how estrogen can be given to women when estrogen is implicated in the growth of endo. It is believed there is a threshold level of estrogen needed to stimulate the endo, any dose of estrogen given below that level shouldn’t cause the growth of endometriosis. Nevertheless any women on HRT who experiences a relapse of endometriosis symptoms needs to consult her doctor as soon as possible.

·         Aromatase inhibitors haven’t been used to treat endometriosis for a very long time so there isn’t as much evidence about their effectiveness as other drugs. Sometimes endometriosis doesn’t respond to other forms of treatment mentioned above. This can be due to the endometriotic lesion having an enzyme called ‘aromatase’ active in it. Endometriosis relies on estrogen to stay active, therefore most treatments either limit or reduce the amount of estrogen the ovaries produce. However if endometriosis has the aromatase enzyme, it can synthesise its own estrogen, essentially becoming independent of the hormones produced by the ovaries and becoming a disease that does not respond to first and second line treatments (this is known as refractory endometriosis). For this kind of endometriosis aromatase inhibitors may be offered. This treatment is especially useful for older women with endometriosis, who are nearing (or past) the menopause, or who may be ineligible for surgery. These drugs do drastically reduce estrogen production in the body though, so can have similar side effects to GnRH analogues, therefore monitoring side effects, particularly in older patients, needs to be undertaken carefully.

Something important to take into consideration though is that, if the symptoms of endometriosis don’t respond well to initial treatment, other conditions must be accounted for too. Endometriosis and adenomyosis are found very frequently together as are adhesions in women with endometriosis, therefore it is important that doctors conduct a thorough investigation to determine exactly what conditions they are dealing with and how best to treat them.

·         Alternative or complimentary therapies are often sought by women suffering the symptoms of endometriosis to try in conjunction with other treatments. Again I would reiterate that doing your research is the most important thing to do, especially where alternative therapies are concerned, mainly because they are not regulated or subject to the same standards of quality control and testing as conventional medicine. One approach that many women benefit from is dietary changes. This doesn’t work for everyone, but if there is the possibility of some relief from the symptoms of endo, it’s always worth giving a try. There are lots of different resources out there that can advise with endo diets and specific recipes and programs to follow, which at the core suggest: eliminating red meat, gluten, diary, processed foods and refined sugars, whilst increasing intake of green vegetables, fruit and omega-3 fatty acid containing foods, so have a look around and see what you can find. One extra bit of advice though, remember there is no such thing as a miracle cure and always be wary of those with an agenda to push or a product to sell, anyone who truly has your best interests at heart will offer advice freely.

·          One of the main concerns of many women with endometriosis is the effect the disease can have on fertility. The true effect of endometriosis on fertility is not one of clear distinction. The proportion of infertile women with endometriosis is reported to be anywhere between 9-50%. Although, before going any further, we need to define infertility and subfertility. Infertility is defined as not being able to conceive at all, however many women with endometriosis are in fact subfertile, meaning that they are able to conceive, but it is much more difficult. It is reported that monthly chances of conception drop from around 25% to 2-10% in women with endo, making becoming pregnant problematic. There are also problems that can occur during pregnancy to consider, some evidence suggests complications like preterm birth, preeclampsia and placenta previa are more common in women with endo, but as long as these risks are recognised by doctors and midwives then any risk to the mother and child should be minimised. One of the most obvious causes of reduced fertility is endometriosis affecting the ovaries (although endo can also have effects on hormonal balance and the structure of the fallopian tubes which affects fertility as well). The presence of endometriosis does not only affect the ovaries; even if an egg is fertilised it must implant in the endometrium to develop. The endometrium has a very narrow timeframe when implantation of the developing embryo can occur, called the ‘window of implantation’.  There have been many studies that have concluded there are several differences in the endometrium of women with and without endometriosis. The big question is though, what clinical implications do those differences have?  Studies have shown that several genes are altered during the window of implantation in the endometrium of women with endometriosis and this may contribute to the reduced fertility some women with endo experience. There is a much more in depth article on the effect of endometriosis on pregnancy outcomes you can read, for free, here.

Women suffering from fertility issues may decide to undergo assisted reproduction technology (ART) to aid in achieving pregnancy. ART can refer to therapies such as fertility medication and in vitro fertilisation (IVF), which are the more common forms of ART. The studies that have been conducted on the use of ART in women with endometriosis have found that having endo doesn’t appear to alter the success of these treatments.


Medical therapy does, and always will, have its uses in managing endometriosis, and hopefully will only improve as the years go by and our understanding of the disease and the progression of technology marches ever onward. However, at present medical therapies don’t get rid of the disease itself, rather they aim to alleviate the symptoms. The best long term results from the symptoms of endo come from surgery to physically remove the disease. In order to diagnose and surgically treat endometriosis a laparoscopy is the most common type of surgery performed. This involves inserting several ‘arms’ (which are like metal tubes) into the pelvis that have various attachments like a camera and manipulators or surgical scissors or a laser etc. Depending on how complex the surgery is and what needs to be done depends on how many tools the surgeon will have to use. Usually with laparoscopy you will end up with several small (about 1-1.5cm long) incisions around the pelvic area.

The advantage of laparoscopy is that endometriosis can be diagnosed and treated during the same operation, if time permits, though some women will have to have a diagnostic laparoscopy separate from a therapeutic one.  The different surgical procedures can be classified in two ways depending on the extent of the surgery that needs to be done.

·         Conservative surgery is a term given to surgical procedures that generally spare the removal of whole organs, instead focussing on removal of the disease itself. This can be done using two methods; ablation of the lesions and excision of the lesions. Ablation involves using heat to burn away and destroy the lesions (often using a laser), whereas excision actually cuts out and removes the lesions (which can also be done using a laser). Both excision and ablation have their place in endometriosis surgery, ablation can be more useful if cutting out an area of endometriosis could prove dangerous. For example, when it comes to operating on the ovaries, cutting out a cyst (cystectomy) may lead to damage of the underlying tissues of the ovary, leading to reduced fertility. For example, due to the nature of endometriotic ovarian cysts, when surgically removing them 54-69% of ovarian tissue can be removed too compared to only 6% when dealing with other ovarian cyst types. Some studies have suggested that ablating ovarian endometriotic cysts may increase the rate future pregnancy, especially when using IVF.

 There are few studies that actually examine the difference between the effectiveness of ablation and excision for endometriosis. Those that have been done suggest that both techniques are roughly equally effective for the treatment of minimal endometriosis, but excision is the preferable option for deep lesions and ovarian endometriotic cysts, as it leads to better symptom improvement and less likelihood of the disease recurring, but as mentioned above careful consideration needs to be made when weighing up the outcomes desired by the patient.

·         Radical surgery involves the whole or partial removal of organs for the treatment of endometriosis. This can be as a result of deep endometriosis infiltrating the bowel (which can occur in 6-35% of deep endo cases) or the urinary tract (which can occur in 1-5% of deep endo cases). Other forms of radical surgery include hysterectomy, salpingectomy (removal of the fallopian tubes) and oophorectomy (removal of one or both ovaries). You may wonder why a hysterectomy would be beneficial for endometriosis, after all the lesions are the cause of the symptoms and they are most frequently found around the uterus, not on it. As mentioned before, adenomyosis and endometriosis are two conditions found very frequently together and unfortunately hysterectomy is the most effective treatment for adenomyosis. Hysterectomy though is not a viable treatment option for endometriosis alone and, although some insist on grasping to the idea that hysterectomy is somehow a cure for endometriosis, this is simply not the case.

Careful consideration needs to be made when deciding the optimal surgical approach for different types of endometriosis and the conditions associated with it. For example, although the risk is still low, radical surgery does carry an increased risk in operative and post-operative complications, some of which can be severe, which is why it is always important to discuss the surgical procedure you are going to undergo with your surgeon.


What causes endometriosis?

And the award for the most contentious question in endometriosis goes to…this one! The absolute truth of the matter is that no-one knows for certain what causes endometriosis. There are a few theories though, which at best explain certain aspects of the disease, but as yet there isn’t a unified theory of endometriosis. I’ll give a brief overview of some of the most popular theories here, if however you would like to read an in depth article on the history of endometriosis you can do, here.

Perhaps the most widely known theory is that of retrograde menstruation. This theory was developed in the 1920’s by a U.S physician by the name of John Sampson. He postulated that, during regular menstruation, most of the blood and lining of the uterus (the endometrium) would exit the body in the usual manner, but some would travel up through the fallopian tubes and out into the peritoneal space (which is where the reproductive organs sit). Once there the endometrial fragments implant on and around the surface of the reproductive organs and form growths that are fed by the hormone produced by the body and result in what we call endometriosis.

At the time this theory made an awful lot of sense. Observing endometriosis down the microscope, there are obvious visual similarities between endometriosis and the normal endometrium. Additionally the process of endometrial fragments travelling up and out from the uterus (retrograde menstruation) is known to occur in 90% of women. Furthermore endometriotic lesions seemed to react to hormones in a similar manner to the normal endometrium (i.e. growing when exposed to estrogen). Not only this but over the years using animal models of endometriosis, fragments of the endometrium were injected into the peritoneal space of monkeys, mice and rats to mimic retrograde menstruation and, lo and behold, endometriotic lesions formed. So it’s easy to understand why this theory gained so much traction and popularity. However, as the march of progress continued and research methods became more advanced, some holes in this theory became apparent.

Perhaps the most obvious question to ask would be – if retrograde menstruation is the cause of endometriosis, and retrograde menstruation happens in 90% of women, why don’t 90% of women have endometriosis? It is known that women with endo show alterations in their immune system that could allow endometriosis to form. In particular, women with endo show alterations in the immune cells that would normally clear away the refluxed endometrial fragments, making it easier for the cells to implant around the reproductive organs.

Detailed analysis of endometriotic lesions however, has shown that there are distinct differences in the genetic, protein and gene regulation profiles and sensitivity to hormones between endometriosis and the normal endometrium indicating they are quite different tissue types. Certain types of endometriosis are difficult to explain with the retrograde menstruation theory, in particular endometriosis outside the pelvic area. Endometriosis has been found in almost every organ in the body (as I’ve written about previously), although it should be noted that some cases of extra-pelvic endo are extremely rare, sometimes only one case exists. Perhaps some of the most damning evidence against retrograde menstruation comes from case reports of endometriosis in unborn foetuses, women who cannot menstruate, animals that don’t menstruate  and in men (although there have only been a handful of male endometriosis cases reported worldwide).

The evidence of endometriosis like patches in unborn foetuses certainly suggests endometriosis, or at the least the propensity to develop it, is something you are born with. Familial and genetic studies support this as it has been found that there are genetic alterations more common in women with endo and women with a first degree relative with endometriosis, are much more likely to develop the disease too.

 So what could the answer be? Several other theories have been proposed about how endometriosis could arise. One suggested that, under the influence of hormones like estrogen, normal tissue in the pelvis could transform into endometrial-like tissue. This has led to researchers pointing the finger at environmental pollutants that mimic the effect of estrogen in the body. Although some research has been done into this area, the results are far from conclusive. Experiments done in the

Other theories have taken this further by suggesting that, during the very early development of the reproductive organs in the foetus, some of the tissue that would go on to become the uterus gets ‘misplaced’. When a girl reaches puberty and hormone levels rise, these patches of tissue mature into endometriotic lesions. This explanation would certainly account for the cases of endometriosis in men as all of them have been men undergoing hormone therapy for prostate cancer. You can find a much more detailed analysis of explanations regarding the origin of endometriosis here.

Of course, it could be there is no single cause for endometriosis and there are multiple mechanisms by which the disease can arise. What we do know about the origin of endometriosis can be summarised as

-          Most women with endometriosis report the symptoms appearing in adolescence, particularly near puberty, suggesting hormones play a role in the onset of disease symptoms
-          Endometriosis appears to be a condition you are born with, or you are born with an increased risk of developing the disease. There is nothing you do in life to ‘get’ or ‘catch’ endometriosis, that is down to fate alone.
-          Endometriosis displays a strong genetic component and seems to run in families, this can obviously be a concern for mothers with daughters. However, there is nothing one can do to prevent someone having endometriosis, women with endometriosis need an effective support network and that should start at home. So I’ve always said, the best thing a young girl with endometriosis can have is a mother who understands.
-          Although endometriosis can run in families, it can also occur spontaneously in women with no family history. These cases are more of a mystery and no one really knows how or why they occur. Of course there are plenty of other immune conditions, neurological conditions and cancers, which have a genetic component and can just arise seeming out of nowhere, so it could very well be that endometriosis is no different.
-          Endometriosis doesn’t appear to affect any race, or ethnic group disproportionally like other disease such as fibroids or diabetes. However no large studies have been conducted to investigate whether this is true or not.
-          Other medical conditions such as immune conditions seem to be more frequent in women in endo, suggesting whatever influences the development of endometriosis also influences the risk of other conditions as well

Information for Partners and Family Members

I’ve been the partner of a woman with endometriosis for 17 years at the time I’m writing this and also I’ve been the son of a woman with endometriosis all my life; it has been the inspiration for me to study endometriosis professionally and why I write this blog.

Over the years there are few lessons that I’ve learnt that I hope others will find useful in supporting someone with endometriosis. I should point out that I can only talk from the male partners perspective, because that is what I am, I hope this advice is applicable to everyone, but if there are specific issues or experiences you know of that apply to same sex couples, or if you are a trans person with endo, I’d love to hear about your experiences either in the comments or message me @endoupdateblog on twitter.

Perhaps the most important thing I’ve learnt is that many women with endo have to face continual invalidation of their symptoms from people in general and medical professionals sometimes. Endometriosis is not a visible disability, many women with endo look fine (don’t ever say to someone with endo “but you look fine”) which makes it difficult to know exactly what the condition can do unless you’ve had a great deal of personal experience with it. So simply believing someone with endo when they describe what’s wrong, or how they are feeling is very important. Another point is understanding the limitations that endometriosis can put on someone. Endo can result in pain during certain times and ‘flare ups’ that mean the person cannot do everyday activities and this is especially frustrating for them, so it is essential to not make them feel blamed or at fault; it is the disease’s fault, not there’s. I found that an individual’s endometriosis is like a separate entity that has its own moods and character, if you come to know that character you know how best to respond to it, so you don’t feel helpless and actually feel helpful.

Feelings of guilt at not being able to go out and socialise or do everyday things, are common in women with endo and other chronic conditions, therefore be mindful of how you respond to someone’s limitations so as not to cause or worsen feelings of guilt. That is not to say you need to be treading on eggshells or offering pity to people with endo, just that a bit of patience, understanding and consideration will go a long way.

Of course as with many chronic illnesses intimacy between partners can become an issue. This can be especially the case with endometriosis as the condition can lead to symptoms that make sex too painful and the treatments can decrease libido. A partner of someone who experiences these symptoms needs to understand that sex isn’t the be all and end all of a relationship, most of you probably know that already, but women with endo can sometimes feel pressured or like they have to satisfy their partner. If this is the case it’s up to you to reassure her that intimacy isn’t just about sex and remind her of all the other wonderful things about her that are the real reason you’re together. And sometimes it might be that you both do want sex, but don’t forget that sex isn’t just one thing, there are lots and lots of things to try that can be good for both you; different positions, taking it slow, lots of foreplay, use your imagination! Be patient.

One of the most difficult aspects of being a partner or family member of someone with endo is seeing someone you love in pain but being unable to do anything about it. I’ve experienced this feeling of helplessness a lot myself, but educating yourself about the disease and how it affects the person you care about will give you real insights into things you can do to help. No, you will not be able to cure them, but learning about treatments and how that person’s endo works will allow you to have an open dialogue with them about their condition and what the little things are you can do that make a big difference. Sometimes it can as simple as knowing when to make a hot water bottle to knowing not to plan an event or activity during certain times of the month, it all helps lower the burden of endometriosis.

I can’t emphasise enough the importance of education about endometriosis, being able to talk to someone openly and frankly about their condition improves a relationship between two people by creating ways for them to talk and interact which would otherwise be shut off because of the illness. An illness like endometriosis doesn’t have to be a barrier between people, it can be the exact opposite, you’ve got to put the time and effort, but the helping someone you care about is worth it.


Further information

There are loads of other good endometriosis information sites out there, notable ones include:







If I’ve missed any sites out that you think should be on this list, add them to the comments below, links to personal blogs are also welcome, however a strict policy I have on this blog is that no adverts or links to sites containing adverts for products or services that have not been tested with an adequate level of scientific rigor will be allowed.  

Tuesday, 30 April 2013

Research Roundup



Fresh from the success of endometriosis awareness month endometriosis research has continued apace. Unfortunately I’ve been quite busy lately so I haven’t had much time to write a detailed overview on any research this month. But, what I will do is briefly cover some of the highlights of endometriosis research that has been published over April.

To start us off is an article from South Korea looking into the effect of laparoscopic surgery for endo and its effect on the ability to conceive naturally. This study took 43 infertile women with endometriosis and followed up their conception rates 12 months after they underwent laparoscopic surgery to remove their disease. The overall result was 18 out of 43 women (41.9%) had conceived naturally after 12 months. As fertility issues are a major concern for women with endometriosis it is good to know surgical intervention can improve the likelihood of conceiving. (You can read the full article, for free, here)

Next is an encouraging piece of research looking at serious investigation into new treatments for the pain associated with endometriosis. This latest study from Brazil was a Phase II clinical trial (basically a detailed check to see if a drug works before it is put on the market) of melatonin for the treatment of endometriosis associated pain symptoms. You may have heard of melatonin before, it is produced by your body at different levels during the day and is responsible for telling your body when to wake up and go to sleep, but it also acts as an anti-inflammatory and analgesic. Results of this trial showed 10mg melatonin daily for 8 weeks reduced daily pain scores by 39.8% and dysmenorrhoea (excessively painful periods) by 38% also reducing the need for taking other pain killers by 80%. As an added bonus melatonin was also found to improve sleep quality with no severe side effects.

Next is a continuation of investigations into the relationship between environmental pollutants and endometriosis. All the conducted research thus far has failed to provide any conclusive proof of linking one type of pollutant to endometriosis. This latest study hopes to add some weight to the argument by exploring the relationship between Bisphenol A and 14 Phthalate metabolites in women undergoing laparoscopy or MRI. This study found that, in the women undergoing MRI, 6 phthalates were associated with a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with endometriosis. However, in women undergoing laparoscopy and histological confirmation (which is the superior diagnostic method) only two phthalates were found to be associated with an increased risk of being diagnosed with endometriosis. This study highlights the need for researchers to pay special attention to the way studies are conducted when looking at environmental exposures and endometriosis. From my own point of view I think it may be worth looking at younger girls when designing experiments. Every current study has been focussed on adult women with endometriosis, but if endometriosis is a condition you are born with (which the current evidence certainly suggests) then in-utero and early life exposures to pollutants will be more important.

I have written before about the relationship between ovarian endometriosis and ovarian cancer. Having ovarian endometriosis for a long period of time can increase your risk of ovarian cancer, but only by a very small percent. Nevertheless some women with endo may wonder what effects surgical or medical therapy may have on their ovarian cancer risk. A recent study from Sweden has done exactly that by examining medical records of women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer at least one year after being diagnosed with endometriosis and calculating if surgical or medical therapies had any effect. What this study found was that women with endometriosis who had a single ovary removed, or had radical excision of all visible endometriosis, had a significant reduction in their ovarian cancer risk. This study provides further evidence that complete removal of all endometriosis should be a number one priority for all doctors dealing with the disease.

Quicker surgical intervention for endometriosis can only come from quicker diagnosis of endometriosis. This could be achieved with non-invasive tests for endometriosis before laparoscopy - identifying patients with a high likelihood of the disease in an objective way. I’ve reported previously about the current progress of non-invasive tests, but these are just stand alone tests; what if different non-invasive tests were combined? A study from Egypt has shown that combining a blood test for interleukin-6 (a substance produced in your body in response to infection or trauma) with a test for nerve fibres in the endometrium, can push the diagnostic sensitivity for minimal-mild endometriosis to 100% Clearly more research needs to be done in this area to validate these results, but in the future multiple tests from a single blood sample may be able to identify women with endometriosis.

It may seem fairly obvious to anyone who has any spent any length of time with, or near anyone with, endometriosis that the disease can severely impact the sufferers ability to work. However, just knowing its true isn’t enough, in order to convince policy makers, we need empirical evidence that endometriosis has an impact on a woman’s ability to work. What that means is we need scientific studies comparing women with and without endometriosis to show, in numbers and statistics, the true devastating effect of the disease. Fortunately there have been studies in the past conducted for this very reason and now there is another from Denmark. This study gave questionnaires to 610 women diagnosed with endometriosis and 751 reference women relating to health and work ability. Perhaps unsurprisingly this study found that endometriosis was associated with more sick days and low work ability, which in turn was associated with tiredness, daily pain and high pain levels. All obvious things you would think, but we need studies such as these to highlight the impact of endometriosis and get society and governments to take the disease more seriously.

That’s all I’ve got for this month, don’t forget to follow me on Twitter @EndoUpdateBlog for shorter, but more frequent, updates!

Saturday, 30 March 2013

Endometriosis Awareness Month 2013 – Part V



So another Endometriosis Awareness Month draws to a close and we should all be very proud of the achievements we made, whether it’s telling a friend about endometriosis or delivering the keynote address at an international symposium, everything we do matters. Of course, raising endometriosis awareness is an ever continuing endeavour, but with ever growing numbers of women having their voices heard it’ll not be long before the harmony of the righteous drowns the words of the ignorant.

So for the last blog post of this month I’ll be doing a quick overview of all the research I haven’t had a chance to cover in more detail.

To start us off is a paper examining other medical conditions young women with endometriosis suffer from. This study took 138 adolescent women who were diagnosed with endometriosis before the age of 21 and recorded the prevalence of any co-morbid pain conditions (interstitial cystitis, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic headaches, chronic low back pain, vulvodynia, fibromyalgia, temporomandibular joint disease, and chronic fatigue syndrome), mood conditions (depression and anxiety), and asthma. This study found that 56% of the girls suffered from co-morbid pain syndromes (with IBS being the most common), 48% had mood disorders (with depression being, unsurprisingly, the most common), additionally 26% also suffered from asthma. Interestingly 27.5% of the girls had a first degree relative with endometriosis. What this study highlights is the importance of recognising the signs and symptoms of endometriosis in young women, both by family and medical practitioners, because endometriosis, like many other chronic conditions, often has a greater chance of being treated successfully if diagnosed early.

 I’ve reported previously about the economic cost of endometriosis; it’s a sad fact, but a fact none the less, that if you want politicians and world leaders to take notice of something, tell them how much money it’s costing them. Recently there has been much greater interest in quantifying the economic burden of endometriosis and every study that does so vastly increases the chance of people standing up and taking notice. A new study from Austria does just that by calculating the healthcare costs of endometriosis in the country. This study concluded that, in total, endometriosis costs Austria €328 million (£278 million or $422 million) per year*, which as the authors point out, is comparable to the cost of Parkinson’s disease. The authors also make a good point with their concluding remarks in the abstract “The question arises as to whether more timely diagnosis, followed by better-targeted treatment, might have the potential to reduce these costs”. No doubt it would, whilst at the same time benefiting the patients.

*This may be a rather conservative estimate. If we take the total population of females of reproductive age in Austria (women aged 15-55) we get a total of 2,339,000 (according to The World Bank HNP Stats 2010). If we then assume an endometriosis prevalence of 10%, which would expected for a developed country like Austria, we get an estimate of 233,900 endometriosis cases. If we then multiply this by the average cost per endo patient (€7,712 according to this latest study), we get a grand total of €1,803,836,800 which is an awful lot more than previously estimated.

The fact that endometriosis has to be confirmed via an invasive laparoscopy is always going to get researchers interested in looking at different ways to assess the disease without operating on a patient. Several different imaging techniques exist today that allow us to peer inside the body without having to open it up. One of the best imaging techniques is MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), therefore researchers will naturally want to investigate the use of MRI for assessing endometriosis before laparoscopic surgery. A recent study from Germany took this line of thinking further and examined what locations of endometriosis MRI is best at detecting. This study took 152 women with suspected endometriosis and gave them an MRI scan before they went for laparoscopic investigation. After the laparoscopies had been performed they then compared these results to the ones from the MRI to see how accurate the MRI was.
What they found was MRI seems to be very good at identifying endometriosis of the bladder, reasonably good at identifying endometriosis in the Pouch of Douglas, colon and ovaries, but not that good at identifying endometriosis of the peritoneum, which is a shame because peritoneal endo is the most common form of the disease. Still, refinement of the technique in the future may allow for better imaging of endometriosis prior to laparoscopic surgery, giving surgeons a ‘heads up’ as to where to expect to find endometriosis and hence, be more efficient with excising the disease.

Next is an interesting piece of research from France; this study took data from the French E3N cohort, which is a massive collection of information from 98,995 women aged 40-65 who were given questionnaires  in 1990, then follow up questionnaires every 2-3 years detailing aspects of their lives, past and present. What this study did was to look for those women who were surgically diagnosed with endometriosis (2,684 in total) and compare their early life activities and exposure with other women.  
The results of this study suggested that women with endometriosis had an earlier menarche and shorter menstrual cycles before the age of 17. In terms of environment, women with endo were more likely to have lived on a farm for 3+ months (although there was no link to a specific farm animal), had more exposure to indoor passive smoking, experienced food deprivation during WWII and walked for more than 5 hours a week between the ages of 8-15.
It’s difficult to know what to make of this information though; the results about menarche and menstrual cycle confirm what has been reported before, but the significance of the link to environmental exposures listed is a little harder to explain. The only link I can think of between farm living and endometriosis would be exposure to pesticides, as there has been some evidence linking organochlorine pesticides to endo, but most women with endo don’t grow up on a farm so it’s hard to draw a definitive conclusion. The association with passive smoking and exercise is even more of a head scratcher. Both smoking and regular exercise are thought to lower or attenuate estrogen production, being as endo is an estrogen dependant disease, one would think lower estrogen meant less disease risk, so these results are a bit puzzling.
Of course there are some sources of error that can creep into studies such as this, the main one being recollection. The questionnaires gathered data about environmental exposures from the ages of 8-17, but the participants were already aged 40-65 when the questionnaires were given. I’m 30 and I don’t think I could confidentially quantify how many hours of exercise I had, per day, when I was 8. So although this study certainly gave some interesting results, we definitely need further investigation into some of the associated environmental exposures and endometriosis.

Continuing with the theme of environmental exposures by moving on to heavy metal now and no I don’t mean men with long black hair and multiple facial piercing thrashing a guitar. I’m talking about a study conducted with Sri Lankan women with endometriosis, the aim of which was to assess the levels of Nickel, Lead and Cadmium metal in their blood (you can read the full article for free here). You might wonder what the point of looking at these specific metals would be, especially in relation to endometriosis. Well, it turns out that these metals have been documented as being able to activate estrogen receptors, effectively mimicking the action of estrogen within the body, earning them the name ‘metalloestrogens’. What this study found was that levels of Cadmium and Lead were not significantly altered in women with endo compared to disease free women. However the level of Nickel in the blood of the women with endo was significantly higher. To date there have been very, very few other such studies examining the levels of these metalloestrogens in women with endo so, at the moment, this field of investigation is in its infancy. Nevertheless, it looks like a promising area to follow for those interested in environmental exposures in relation to endometriosis.

The field of drug treatment for endometriosis moves pretty slowly. Drugs designed specifically for the treatment of endo are basically non-existent. Most of the drugs used for endo treatment today have been co-opted/altered from drugs for the treatment of other conditions. For example:

Leuprolide acetate – Initially used to treat prostate cancer
Medroxyprogesterone acetate – Used as a contraceptive
Birth control pills – Contraceptives
Danazol – Used for menstrual disorders (although Danazol was the first drug specifically to treat endometriosis, it is now over 40 years old and has an unfavourable side effect profile).

Recently there has been the development of Dienogest, which although used primarily as a contraceptive, was also designed with endometriosis treatment in mind. But that still means we’re getting a new endo specific treatment every 40 years or so, which is poor progress even by the most optimistic of standards.
In light of the lack of new drugs, other drugs are still being found that should help treat endo; two classes of which are Aromatase inhibitors and Cyclooxygenase (COX-2) inhibitors, which were designed for the treatment of breast cancer and autoimmune conditions respectively. The reason these are used for the treatment of endo is that they inhibit key enzymes endometriotic cells use to synthesise their own estrogen supply. Wouldn’t it be a good idea then, to use these types of drugs in combination to suppress endometriosis? It turns out maybe not. A recent study on mice examining the effect of an aromatase inhibitor (Anastrozole) and a COX-2 inhibitor (Celecoxib) found that, although these drugs worked well on their own to reduce the reduce of the growth of endometriosis, in combination they actually reversed their effects. Studies such as this highlight the need for better testing of drugs ‘borrowed’ from other treatments and the urgent need for drugs designed specifically for endometriosis.

Next up a study assessing the prevalence of endometriosis in women with adenomyosis and leiomyoma (uterine fibroids). This study took 220 women aged 40-50 who were undergoing hysterectomy for adenomyosis and/or fibroids; during their surgery these women had a thorough examination of the pelvic region conducted to look for any endometriosis. This study discovered endometriosis in 28.6% of all the women. Endometriosis was found in 40.4% of the women with adenomyosis only, endometriosis was found in 22.7% of the women with fibroids only and endometriosis was found in 34.1% of the women who had both adenomyosis and fibroids. These results show that these three conditions are frequently found together. It would’ve been interesting to see if these results were similar for different age groups but that’s something for future study.
It’s interesting that endometriosis and adenomyosis are found together so often because they are both characterised by endometrial-like cell displacement (although in adenomyosis the endometrial cells are found inside the muscle wall of the uterus). All together this provides a bit more evidence that endometriosis and adenomyosis are related, possibly established before birth and may even share a similar origin.

 Penultimately, here are a few case reports from the rogue’s gallery of endometriosis appearing in unusual places. First is a report of endometriosis of the perineum and secondly is a case report of endometriosis of the mons pubis.

Finally on our whistle stop tour through endometriosis research is a reminder that endometriosis is not a uniquely human concern. There are 16 species of primate (including ourselves) that can develop endo and it’s no stretch of the imagination to assume that the disease is as horrible for our monkey cousins as it is for us. So we’ll end on a lighter note with a study from Germany looking at medically treating marmosets with endometriosis. The authors of this study noted that marmosets with endometriosis showed significant deviations in social behaviour and cognitive tasks, which is unsurprising if they’re in pain all the time. The researchers gave the marmosets an unspecified medical treatment and noted that it improved their social and cognitive function. So at least it was a happy ending for the monkeys.

Thus concludes this run of blog posts for endo awareness 2013, hopefully you’ve learned something new, I know I have. It’s heartening to know that research into endometriosis is more popular than ever and looks set to gain ever more interest in the future.